CRANV1P1
ASLIB Cranfield Research Project: Factors Determining the Performance of Indexing Systems: VOLUME 1. Design, Part 1. Text
Formation of Index Languages
chapter
Cyril Cleverdon
Jack Mills
Michael Keen
Cranfield
An investigation supported by a grant to Aslib by the National Science Foundation.
Use, reproduction, or publication, in whole or in part, is permitted for any purpose of the United States Government.
-65 -
Then, if a request is made for a_b_b, there are the following alternative basic
programmes which can be used.
(1) Term and species - i.e. ab + aba, abb ... abz[OCRerr]
(2) Superordinate - i.e. ab + a (but excluding other subclasses of a; this is how
,generic' search is popularly interpreted in general library practice where a might
represent a general treatise on the subject of which a._bb is a subclass).
(3) Generic - i.e. a+ aa + aaa, aab ... aaz + ab + aba, abb ... abz + ac + aca,
acb ... acz + az + aza, azb ... azz (this is how ,generic' search is normally inter-
preted in machine systems and is analogous to search (I) where the content of class
ab is taken to include the individually specified subclasses aba, abb, abc ... ).
(4)" Coordinate - i.e. a selection of the more likely classes coordinate with a_b_b, e.g.
ab + aa + ad; e. g., in a category of three-dimensional shapes a search for Spheroid
can be extended generically by searching under Body of Revolution, or by examining
all the different kinds of Body of Revolution (Sphere, Hemisphere, Ogive, Cone, etc. ).
But some of the latter will be more closely connected to Spheroid than others (e. g.
Sphere} and an intermediate search, stopping well short of examining every, species,
can be made. It is true, of course, that a 'closer connection' between several sub-
classes implies the possibility of an intermediate step of division being inserted.
Hut we have to stop somewhere.
(5) Subordinate - i.e. a selection of the more likely subclasses of a_bb, e.g. abb + abn.
It will be noted that programmes (1), (2} and (3) [OCRerr]re obligatory; no freedom of
choice is given to the searcher, but (4} and (5) are permissive, the decision as to
the formation of the classes being at the discretion of each searcher.
To return to the matter of variations between single-term and concept hierarchies,
the shrinking of a concept hierarchy by restricting it to a one-place hierarchy of
single terms is seen by the following, which is the schedule given on pages 62-3 and
reduced in this way.
V] 2 l[OCRerr]xperiment + Experimental
V9a/10 Visual + Visualization
V11 Spectrography
V12 Stroboscopic
V13 Shadowgraph
V14,16 Photography + Photorecording
V17 Schlieren
V18 Spark
V19 Interferometry
V21 Interferogram
V23 (Fringe) Shift
V24 Strioscopy
V25 Interferential
V25a Clay
V25b China
Of the 29 classes in the concept hierarchies only 13 appear in the one-place
hierarchy plus two (Interferogram and Lnterferential) which appear for the reasons