IRE Simulation, and simulation experiments chapter Michael D. Heine Butterworth & Company Karen Sparck Jones All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, including photocopying and recording, without the written permission of the copyright holder, application for which should be addressed to the Publishers. Such written permission must also be obtained before any part of this publication is stored in a retrieval system of any nature. 198 Simulation, and simulation experiments 16. GORE, n. (Ed.) Farewell to Alexandna, Greenwood Press, Westport, Conn. (1976) 17. UNIVERSITY GRANTS COMMITTEE [U.K.] Capital Provisionlor University Libraries: Report oli' Working Party (Chairman R. Atkinson). HMSO, London (1976) 18. HEINE, M. H. Measures of language effectiveness and the Swetsian hypotheses, Journal i,f Documentation 31, 283-287 (1975) 19. ANGIONE, P. V. On the equivalence of boolean and weighted searching based on liw convertibility of query forms, Journal ofthe American Societyfor Information Science 26, 112 124(1975) 20. GURK, H. M. and MINKER, J. The design of a simulation for an information processing syslem, Journal of the ACM 8, 26O[OCRerr]270 (1961) 21. HERTZ, D. B. et al. Research Study of Criteria and Procedures for Evaluating SCieflI[OCRerr]4 Information Retrieval Systems, Arthur Anderson & Co., CESTI Report AD2731 15 (1962) 22. BOURNE, C. P. and FORD, D. F. Cost analysis and simulation procedures for the evaluation of large information Systems, American Documentation 15, 142-149 (1964) 23. BLUNT, C., DUQUET, R. and LUCKIE, P. Simulation of information Systems: some exampIc[OCRerr], limitations, and an example of a general information systems simulation. In: Proceedings ol the 20th Annual Meeting of the AD!, Thompson Book Co., Washington, D.C. (1967) 24. BAKER, N. R. and NANCE, R. E. The use of simulation in studying information storage and retrieval Systems, American Documentation 19, 363-370 (1968) 25. FRIED, J. B. et al. Index Simulation Feasibility and Automatic Document Classification, Technical Report 68-4, Ohio State University, Computer and Information Science Resea[OCRerr][OCRerr]l[OCRerr] Center, CFSTI Report PB182597 (1968) 26. REILLY, K. D. User Determination of Library Request Presentation: a Simulation, Institute or Library Research, University of California, Los Angeles (1968) 27. REILLY, K. D. Digital Computer Simulation Models of Library Based Infi[OCRerr]rmation-retriel.al Systems, Institute of Library Research, University of California, Los Angeles (1969) 28. COOPER, M.D. Evaluation of Information Retrieval Systems: a Simulation and Cost ApproacA, Ph.D. thesis, School of Librarianship, University of California, Berkeley (1971) 29. HEINE, M. H. Incorporation of the age of a document into the retrieval process, Information Processing and Management 13, 3547 (1977) 30. GRIFFIThS, J.-M. The Computer Simulation of Information Retrieval Systems, Ph.D. lhe[OCRerr]ii, School of Library, Archive and Information Studies, University College London (1978) 31. COOPER, w. 5. The `why bother?' theory of information science, Journal of Informatics 2, 2 5 (1978) 32. CLEVERDON, C. W., MILLS, J. and KEEN, E. M. Factors Determining the Performance ofindexing Systems, 2 Vols., Cranfield, College of Aeronautics, Aslib Cranfield Research Project (1966) 33. SPARCK JONES, K. Collection properties influencing automatic term classification, Informalit)n Storage and Retrieval 9, 499-513 (1973) 34. VAN RIJSBERGEN, C. J. and SPARCK JONES, K. A test for the separation of relevant and non relevant documents in experimental retrieval collections, Journal of Documentation 29, 251 257 (1973) 35. JABLONSKI, S. The preconstructed vocabulary: a Procrustean bed. Bulletin of the Medkal Library Association 61, 21-23 (1973) J