IRE
Information Retrieval Experiment
The Cranfield tests
chapter
Karen Sparck Jones
Butterworth & Company
Karen Sparck Jones
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced
or transmitted in any form or by any means, including photocopying
and recording, without the written permission of the copyright holder,
application for which should be addressed to the Publishers. Such
written permission must also be obtained before any part of this
publication is stored in a retrieval system of any nature.
284 The Cranfield tests
15. REES, A. M. The Aslib-Cranfield test of the Western Reserve University indexing system for
metallurgical literature: a review of the final report, American Documentation 16, 73-76
(1965)
16. CLEvERnnN, C. W. The Cranfield hypotheses, Library Quarterly 35, 121-124 (1965); with
rejoinder by Swanson, p.125
1 7. CLEVERDON, C. W. The testing and evaluation of the Operating efficiency of the intellectual
stages of information retrieval Systems, with following discussion. In: ClassIfication
Research: Proceedings of the Second International Study Confirence (Ed. P. Atherton),
Munksgaard, Copenhagen (1965)
I 8. CLEVERDON, C. W. and MILLS, J. The testing of index language devices, Aslib Proceedings 15,
106130(1963)
19. CLEVERDON, C. W., MILLS, J. and KEEN, E. M. Factors Determining the Performance oflndexing
Systems, 2 Vols, College of Aeronautics, Cranfield (1966). (The Report material is
summarized in CLEVERDON, C. W. The Cranfield tests on index language devices, Aslib
Proceedings 19, 173-194 (1967))
20. VICKERY, B. C. Reviews of CLEVERnoN, C. W., MILLS, 3. and KEEN E. M. The Cranfield 2
Report, Journal of Documentation 22,347-349(1966) and 23, 338-340(1967)
21. SWANSON, D. R. Some unexplained aspects of the Cranfield tests of indexing language
performance, Library Quarterly 41, 223-228 (1971)
22. EtARTER, S. P. The Cranfield II relevance assessments: a critical evaluation, Library Quarterly
41, 229-243(1971)
23. SHARP, 3. Content analysis, specification and control. In: Annual Review of Information
Science and Technology, Vol.2 (Ed. C. A. Cuadra), Interscience, New York (1967)
24. REES, A. M. Evaluation of information systems and services. In: Annual Review ofinformation
Science and Technology, Vol.2 (Ed. C. A. Caudra), Interscience, New York (1967)
25. CLEVERDON, C. W. The Eftect of Variations in Relevance Assessments in Comparative
Experimental TesLt 0/index Languages, OSTI Report 5075, Cranfield Institute of Technology
(1970)
26. LESK, M. E. and SALTON, 6. Relevance assessments and retrieval system evaluation,
hlfi)rmation Storage and Retrieval 4, 343-359 (1968)
27 CLEVERDON, C. W. On the inverse relationship of recall and precision, Journal of
Documentation 28, 195-201(1972)
28. CLEVERDON, C. W. An investigation into a Suitable Mechanised Information Retrieval System
at the Defence Operational Analysis Establishment, Cranfield Institute of Technology (1970)
29. CLEVERDON, C. W. and HARDING, P. Report of an investigation into a Mechanised Information
Retriel'al Seri'ice in a Speciahsed Subject Area, Cranfield Institute of Technology (1970)
30. CLEVERDON, C. w. A Comparatit'e Evaluation ofSearching by Controlled Language and Natural
Language in an Experimental NASA Data Base, Cranfield Institute of Technology (1977)
31. AITCHISON, T. M. et al. Comparative Evaluation oflndexing Languages, Part II: Results, Report
R70/2, INSPEC, Institution of Electrical Engineers, London (1970)
32. KEEN, E. M. and DIGGER, 3. A. Report of an InfOrmation Science Index Languages Test, 2 Vols,
College of Librarianship Wales, Aberystwyth (1972)
33. SPARCK JONES, K. Automatic Key'word Classification for Information Retrieval, Butterworths,
London (1971)
34. SALTON, G. (Ed.) The SMART Retrieval System: Experiments in Automatic Document
Processing, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J. (1971)
35. SVENONIUS, E. An experiment in index term frequency, Journal of the American Society for
Information Science 23, 109-121(1972)
36. SPARCK JONES, K. and BATES, R. G. Research on Automatic Indexing J974-1976, 2 Vols, British
Library Research and Development Report 5464, Computer Laboratory, University of
Cambridge (1977)
37. VAN RIJSBERGEN, C. J. and CROFT, W. B. Document clustering: an evaluation of some
experiments with the Cranfield 1400 collection, InfOrmation Processing and Management 11,
171-182(1975)