IRE Information Retrieval Experiment The Cranfield tests chapter Karen Sparck Jones Butterworth & Company Karen Sparck Jones All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, including photocopying and recording, without the written permission of the copyright holder, application for which should be addressed to the Publishers. Such written permission must also be obtained before any part of this publication is stored in a retrieval system of any nature. 284 The Cranfield tests 15. REES, A. M. The Aslib-Cranfield test of the Western Reserve University indexing system for metallurgical literature: a review of the final report, American Documentation 16, 73-76 (1965) 16. CLEvERnnN, C. W. The Cranfield hypotheses, Library Quarterly 35, 121-124 (1965); with rejoinder by Swanson, p.125 1 7. CLEVERDON, C. W. The testing and evaluation of the Operating efficiency of the intellectual stages of information retrieval Systems, with following discussion. In: ClassIfication Research: Proceedings of the Second International Study Confirence (Ed. P. Atherton), Munksgaard, Copenhagen (1965) I 8. CLEVERDON, C. W. and MILLS, J. The testing of index language devices, Aslib Proceedings 15, 106130(1963) 19. CLEVERDON, C. W., MILLS, J. and KEEN, E. M. Factors Determining the Performance oflndexing Systems, 2 Vols, College of Aeronautics, Cranfield (1966). (The Report material is summarized in CLEVERDON, C. W. The Cranfield tests on index language devices, Aslib Proceedings 19, 173-194 (1967)) 20. VICKERY, B. C. Reviews of CLEVERnoN, C. W., MILLS, 3. and KEEN E. M. The Cranfield 2 Report, Journal of Documentation 22,347-349(1966) and 23, 338-340(1967) 21. SWANSON, D. R. Some unexplained aspects of the Cranfield tests of indexing language performance, Library Quarterly 41, 223-228 (1971) 22. EtARTER, S. P. The Cranfield II relevance assessments: a critical evaluation, Library Quarterly 41, 229-243(1971) 23. SHARP, 3. Content analysis, specification and control. In: Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, Vol.2 (Ed. C. A. Cuadra), Interscience, New York (1967) 24. REES, A. M. Evaluation of information systems and services. In: Annual Review ofinformation Science and Technology, Vol.2 (Ed. C. A. Caudra), Interscience, New York (1967) 25. CLEVERDON, C. W. The Eftect of Variations in Relevance Assessments in Comparative Experimental TesLt 0/index Languages, OSTI Report 5075, Cranfield Institute of Technology (1970) 26. LESK, M. E. and SALTON, 6. Relevance assessments and retrieval system evaluation, hlfi)rmation Storage and Retrieval 4, 343-359 (1968) 27 CLEVERDON, C. W. On the inverse relationship of recall and precision, Journal of Documentation 28, 195-201(1972) 28. CLEVERDON, C. W. An investigation into a Suitable Mechanised Information Retrieval System at the Defence Operational Analysis Establishment, Cranfield Institute of Technology (1970) 29. CLEVERDON, C. W. and HARDING, P. Report of an investigation into a Mechanised Information Retriel'al Seri'ice in a Speciahsed Subject Area, Cranfield Institute of Technology (1970) 30. CLEVERDON, C. w. A Comparatit'e Evaluation ofSearching by Controlled Language and Natural Language in an Experimental NASA Data Base, Cranfield Institute of Technology (1977) 31. AITCHISON, T. M. et al. Comparative Evaluation oflndexing Languages, Part II: Results, Report R70/2, INSPEC, Institution of Electrical Engineers, London (1970) 32. KEEN, E. M. and DIGGER, 3. A. Report of an InfOrmation Science Index Languages Test, 2 Vols, College of Librarianship Wales, Aberystwyth (1972) 33. SPARCK JONES, K. Automatic Key'word Classification for Information Retrieval, Butterworths, London (1971) 34. SALTON, G. (Ed.) The SMART Retrieval System: Experiments in Automatic Document Processing, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J. (1971) 35. SVENONIUS, E. An experiment in index term frequency, Journal of the American Society for Information Science 23, 109-121(1972) 36. SPARCK JONES, K. and BATES, R. G. Research on Automatic Indexing J974-1976, 2 Vols, British Library Research and Development Report 5464, Computer Laboratory, University of Cambridge (1977) 37. VAN RIJSBERGEN, C. J. and CROFT, W. B. Document clustering: an evaluation of some experiments with the Cranfield 1400 collection, InfOrmation Processing and Management 11, 171-182(1975)